Some arguments for propositional logic: MacColl as a philosopher
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Propositional Logic as a Propositional Fuzzy Logic
There are several ways to extend the classical logical connectives for fuzzy truth degrees, in such a way that their behavior for the values 0 and 1 work exactly as in the classical one. For each extension of logical connectives the formulas which are always true (the tautologies) changes. In this paper we will provide a fuzzy interpretation for the usual connectives (conjunction, disjunction, ...
متن کاملAlgorithms for generating arguments and counterarguments in propositional logic
A common assumption for logic-based argumentation is that an argument is a pair 〈Φ, α〉 where Φ is minimal subset of the knowledgebase such that Φ is consistent and Φ entails the claim α. Different logics provide different definitions for consistency and entailment and hence give us different options for formalising arguments and counterarguments. The expressivity of classical propositional logi...
متن کاملExtended Resolution as Certificates for Propositional Logic
When checking answers coming from automatic provers, or when skeptically integrating them into proof assistants, a major problem is the wide variety of formats of certificates, which forces to write lots of different checkers. In this paper, we propose to use the extended resolution as a common format for every propositional prover. To be able to do this, we detail two algorithms transforming p...
متن کاملEquality propositional logic and its extensions
We introduce a new formal logic, called equality propositional logic. It has two basic connectives, $boldsymbol{wedge}$ (conjunction) and $equiv$ (equivalence). Moreover, the $Rightarrow$ (implication) connective can be derived as $ARightarrow B:=(Aboldsymbol{wedge}B)equiv A$. We formulate the equality propositional logic and demonstrate that the resulting logic has reasonable properties such a...
متن کاملPropositional Dynamic Logic as a Logic of Belief Revision
This paper shows how propositional dynamic logic (PDL) can be interpreted as a logic for multi-agent belief revision. For that we revise and extend the logic of communication and change (LCC) of [9]. Like LCC, our logic uses PDL as a base epistemic language. Unlike LCC, we start out from agent plausibilities, add their converses, and build knowledge and belief operators from these with the PDL ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Philosophia Scientae
سال: 2011
ISSN: 1281-2463,1775-4283
DOI: 10.4000/philosophiascientiae.368